![]() |
| Murder most foul |
![]() |
| The Invisible Man strikes again! |
![]() |
| Trerice Manor, the scene of the crime |
![]() |
| Murder most foul |
![]() |
| The Invisible Man strikes again! |
![]() |
| Trerice Manor, the scene of the crime |
Due to a recent resurgence in spam messages, I have disabled anonymous commenting. I realize this may be annoying to some users who do not wish to sign up for a Google account, but this is the easiest way for me to deal with spam and still have comments appear in a timely manner.
Please keep all discussion civil.
Up to this moment, he had been sustained by intellectual curiosity. The mystery had seemed more important than the murder. It had challenged him like a problem in chess or mathematics.
But now that it was no longer a mystery, he realized to the full that neither was it a game played with senseless pieces, nor a problem living only in the mind of a mathematician. He was dealing with human beings like himself who could feel and hope, think and suffer…
- Helen McCloy, Dance of Death
“The crime, you see, is just to set the stakes. The real message of the detective story is that even in the worst of circumstances, a man or woman can make things right using courage, tenacity, and brainpower. Even though writers depict protagonists who are corrupt or criminal, the characters are at least trying to do something about their lives. That’s especially appealing in these days when so much of so-called serious literature is plotless, hopeless, and, in the eyes of many, pointless. [...]
For a long time, there has been a school of criticism putting down mystery stories as ‘crossword puzzles in prose.’ This is nonsense, as the smallest familiarity with the genre will show. Mysteries range from light comedy to Grand Guignol, with every gradation in between, including that of (ahem) literary art. It happens rarely, to be sure, but it happens just as rarely in those rarefied circles of writing whose practitioners are shooting for art and nothing else. And in the mystery, the misses are still fun to read.
But even if mysteries were crossword puzzled with plotlines, what of it? What kind of plotlines are we talking about? Good versus evil, order versus chaos, illusion versus reality, and the necessity of thought as a tool of survival. I’ll take that.”
—William L. DeAndrea, Introduction to Encyclopedia Mysteriosa
er, a tautened wire?
ReplyDeleteIn spite of the positive tone of your review, it's your comment on the condensing of the plot that makes me wonder whether the Western-style of comic books is apposite for translating our favorite detective stories into a visual medium.
ReplyDeleteComic books, especially European comics, seem to insist on being slender volumes with a low page-count, which works well for original series designed with this format in mind, but not very convenient for adaptations. You can't shoehorn an entire novel in fifty pages without loosing something.
Now imagine if these comic book adaptations were done as manga books in the realistic style of Kindaichi. The writer of that series may be a hack, but the artist knows how to bring a story alive and they take 400 pages, if necessary, to tell a story.
TomCat, while I agree that it would be nice if comic books had the bravery to be longer if they needed to, this book does an admirable job. There are only a few moments-- in general, the plot is extremely fast-paced and makes for wonderful reading. And while it *is* brief, that's not necessarily a bad thing-- brevity is the soul of wit, as one Bill Shakespeare once said.
ReplyDeleteI've read a lot of French BDs and have all the Kindaichi. It's quite possible that a Kindaichi version of The Demon of Dartmoor would run to 400 pages, but would not include any more detail than the BD. This is for three reasons:
ReplyDelete1. the page size of the BD format is more than twice that of the Kindaichi manga.
2. a great deal of the manga "detail" consists of close-up reactions to whatever has just been said. It's analogous to a frame-by-frame movie shoot. You could probably cut out two-thirds of the manga pictures without omitting any of the important clues. I'm not saying this makes the manga technique worse, it's just different.
3. the BD technique allows for more sweeping views than the manga, into which a lot of visual cluing can be packed, thus avoiding dialog.
I've read the novel and I can assure everyone that nothing has been lost in what is a very good adaptation.
John Pugmire